Zimbabwe’s Climate Law Puts Business On The Frontline
On a weekday morning in Harare, with PowerPoint slides glowing and coffee cooling in paper cups, Dr Solomon Mutambara looked out over a room of business executives and development partners and said the quiet part out loud.
“The government cannot just do that,” he told them.
The “that” in question is Zimbabwe’s climate transition. After two years of drafting, debate and consultation, the country’s first dedicated climate law – the Climate Change Management Bill – is now only a presidential signature away from becoming an Act. If the current timetable holds, that assent could come before the end of September.
When it does, the centre of gravity for climate action will shift. Away from conference podiums and strategy documents. Towards factory floors, pack sheds, mines, transport fleets – and the balance sheets of the businesses that run them.
What Exactly Is Zimbabwe’s Climate Change Management Bill?
For two years, a small team in the Ministry of Environment, Climate and Wildlife has worked on what sounds straightforward and turned out not to be: writing the country’s first climate-specific law.
“It’s not as simple as we thought when we began the process,” said Tirivanhu Muhwati, Acting Deputy Director for Carbon Markets, addressing the same gathering.
The Climate Change Management Bill has already passed sectoral and provincial consultations, survived the gauntlet of the National Assembly, and cleared the Senate. Only presidential assent remains. Once signed, it will become an enforceable Climate Change Management Act.
To understand what that Act is meant to do, Muhwati began not with clauses and penalties but with the global architecture sitting above it.
- The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change provides the overarching policy direction.
- The Paris Agreement does the operational work, requiring each country to file a Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) setting out its emissions-reduction plans.
- Zimbabwe’s NDC commits to reducing greenhouse gas emissions per person by 2030.
- A Low Emission Development Strategy (LEDS) sketches the country’s emissions pathway out to mid-century.
- Both feed into national blueprints like Vision 2030 and the National Development Strategy 1 (NDS1).
On paper, these documents sit in the environment folder. In practice, they live inside the economy.
“It’s not an environmental issue, it’s a development issue,” Muhwati said. Climate change is already shaping the things that keep Zimbabwe going: the timing and reliability of rains, the flow in Kariba’s turbines, the disease burden carried by communities, and the productivity of farms from Binga to Beitbridge.
Plans do not implement themselves. For that, a country needs law.
How Will The Climate Law Actually Work?
In outline, the Bill has two main halves:
- Obligations and penalties – to make sure national commitments on emissions are actually met.
- Incentives – to reward good behaviour and stimulate investment in cleaner ways of producing.
What it mostly does not do is spell out detailed rules for every sector and activity. This is a deliberate choice. The Bill is a framework Act, not a 200-page rulebook.
FFA Explainer:
A framework Act is a law that creates the basic structures, institutions, and powers needed to act on an issue, without locking in the detailed rules. It allows ministers to issue regulations later, after consultation, so that the law can adapt more quickly to new information, technology, or international rules.
Muhwati was clear about why the drafters went this route. Climate change touches every corner of the economy: agriculture, mining, energy, transport, manufacturing, tourism, health. Trying to legislate every touchpoint up front would not only produce a huge document. It would produce something brittle.
He pointed to Europe’s new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) as a warning. Three years ago, CBAM was barely on Zimbabwe’s radar. Today it is a live commercial threat for exporters of everything from cement to fertiliser.
If Zimbabwe had written a CBAM response into primary legislation, updating it would mean restarting the full constitutional process: public consultations, portfolio committees, readings in Parliament, Senate scrutiny. Years, not months.
By contrast, regulations issued under a framework Act can be turned around relatively quickly. They still have to follow consultation requirements and stay within the Act’s boundaries, but they can move closer to the speed of the markets and climate impacts they are meant to address.
On the emissions-reduction side, Muhwati offered a glimpse of how this flexible architecture might work.
Imagine, he said, that a firm in a particular sector is assigned an emissions allowance – say 100 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year for a defined level of production. If the firm emits less than that while maintaining output, it generates a surplus. If it emits more, the arrangement runs the other way: a liability.
That approach rests on benchmarking against best available technology – asking what is possible, not only what is common practice.
On the day, the details stopped there. “The specifics will be set through regulation and consultation,” Muhwati stressed more than once. “Nobody is going to wake up one morning to a new levy announced overnight.”
He also reminded the room that parts of this world already exist and pay out in cash. Under rules set by the International Civil Aviation Organization, airlines have to offset some of their emissions. Some of that money has financed projects inside Zimbabwe, paying staff, building capacity, and giving airlines community stories they later use in their marketing. Carbon compliance, in other words, has been turned into opportunity before.
Why The Real Deadline Is In Brussels, Not Harare
If Muhwati’s message was that the rules are almost here, Dr Solomon Mutambara’s was that the rules are the easy part.
Dr Mutambara coordinates a Green Climate Fund (GCF) “readiness” project, led by government with support from UNDP Zimbabwe. Its target is the space between Zimbabwe’s climate ambition – the NDC and LEDS – and the practical machinery needed to implement them.
His language was commercial, not environmental. Global markets, he said, are starting to reward climate performance and punish carbon-intensive production.
CBAM is one part of that signal: a carbon price at the European border for certain imports. The Science Based Targets initiative is another, creating pressure on multinational companies to clean up their supply chains.
Between them, they generate a to-do list for any Zimbabwean firm that wants to keep selling into demanding markets: emissions measurement, product-level carbon data, credible baselines, reporting systems, and clear transition plans over the short and long term.
Companies that cannot provide that evidence may find doors quietly closing. A European buyer might simply move to a supplier whose paperwork matches their climate commitments.
That, in Mutambara’s telling, is the real deadline. And it is not being set in Munhumutapa Building.
What Is The GCF Readiness Project Trying To Fix?
Mutambara condensed the project’s logic into a single “if–then” sentence: if Zimbabwe can identify, prioritise and finance the right climate technologies, attract private investment and build a strong pipeline of climate projects, then it will strengthen its strategies, improve the environment for low-emission investment, and meet its NDC and LEDS targets.
The barriers standing in the way are dry but familiar:
- Limited capacity and expertise in assessing climate technologies.
- Insufficient data to decide what should come first.
- Weak coordination between sectors and between public and private actors.
- Thin private sector participation.
On that last point, Mutambara did not sugar-coat it. Very few Zimbabwean companies are currently active in climate technology or carbon markets.
The project’s roadmap spans five main functions:
- Convening – bringing government ministries, business leaders, financiers, technology providers and development partners into the same room.
- Diagnosis – working out where the biggest emissions and climate risks sit, and where technology could make the most difference.
- Capacity building – training officials, engineers, agronomists and managers so climate is not a foreign language.
- Project development – turning ideas into concrete concepts with technical designs and budgets.
- Finance mobilisation – lining those projects up with the GCF and other backers of low-emission investment.
The first big milestone is a Technology Needs Assessment (TNA) – the second Zimbabwe has undertaken. That process is due to start in the coming days. Companies that have not yet been contacted can still register interest via the project team.
For Mutambara, everything has to end somewhere specific.
“Knowledge that does not convert into a bankable pipeline is lip service,” he said, arguing that the end-products should be concept notes, feasibility studies and proposals capable of going in front of the GCF board or other financiers.
Buried inside the project design is an assumption he chose to read aloud: that the private sector will demonstrate capacity to invest in climate projects.
He defended that assumption. Private firms control or influence most of the levers that drive a national emissions number: where capital is deployed, which technologies are installed, how much energy is used and of what type, how supply chains are organised, what kind of jobs are created, and which export markets stay open.
“The government cannot just do that,” he repeated. Policy can signal, regulate and incentivise. It cannot rewire every production line.
What Does This Mean For Farmers And Agribusiness?
Although much of the conversation in Harare centred on industry and trade, the implications run straight through Zimbabwe’s fields and pastures.
Agriculture is both exposed to climate shocks and heavily involved in emissions, from fertiliser use and livestock to energy-hungry irrigation and processing.
For a tobacco contractor in Mashonaland Central, a citrus exporter in Mazowe, or a maize miller in Bulawayo, the direction of travel is now clear:
- Large buyers and off-takers, especially those linked to European or global brands, will demand emissions and climate-risk data from their suppliers.
- Financial institutions may start asking for transition plans and climate risks as part of credit assessments, in line with emerging global norms.
- Government, under the new Act, will have powers to introduce sector-specific incentives and obligations by regulation.
Across Zimbabwe, smallholders are already feeling climate volatility in the most direct way: later or erratic rains, more frequent mid-season dry spells, heat stress on livestock, and shifting pest and disease patterns. NDS1 and the agriculture recovery plans recognise that without climate resilience – in water harvesting, diversified crops, early warning, and extension – Vision 2030’s targets will be hard to reach.
This is where the new climate law, the GCF readiness work, and day-to-day farming reality begin to intersect. Climate-smart irrigation, efficient solar pumping, drought-tolerant seed, improved fodder systems, low-emission fertiliser practices – these are all “climate technologies” when seen through the GCF lens. They are also the basics of survival and growth for smallholders.
In Hwedza, for example, a group of women farmers organised under a local cooperative has been experimenting with solar-powered drip irrigation for vegetables destined for Harare’s supermarkets. When the city’s water rationing worsened, they were able to keep supplying, while neighbours relying on flood irrigation struggled. A future TNA that prioritises such systems could turn stories like theirs from scattered pilots into a scaled programme.
Where Are The Opportunities For Business?
Once the Climate Change Management Act is in place, the incentives side will matter just as much as the penalties.
The framework allows the minister, after consultation, to introduce measures such as:
- Tax or tariff incentives for importing and deploying approved low-emission technologies.
- Recognition or preferential treatment in public procurement for companies that meet certain climate performance thresholds.
- Clear rules for participating in domestic or international carbon markets.
For agribusiness, manufacturing and energy companies, this opens several avenues:
- Developing climate-resilient outgrower schemes can position exporters ahead of tightening buyer requirements.
- Investing in efficient boilers, cold rooms, dryers or irrigation systems can cut operating costs and create potential surplus credits under future benchmarking rules.
- Partnering with development agencies on pilot projects – from biogas at dairy farms to solar cooling for horticulture – can spread risk while building experience.
There is also a narrative opportunity. As international consumers ask harder questions about where their food comes from, being able to point to a clear emissions baseline, a transition plan and verifiable improvements can set Zimbabwean producers apart.
For youth and women in agriculture, an emerging climate-technology market could open new roles: climate data analysts in agritech start-ups, technicians installing and maintaining solar irrigation, local consultants helping SMEs collect and report emissions data, or community-based organisations coordinating adaptation projects that later seek GCF funding.
FFA has already tracked early versions of this shift in areas as varied as solar irrigation schemes, energy-efficient tobacco barns, and regenerative livestock systems. The new law could give such experiments a clearer policy home.
What Should Zimbabwean Firms Do Now?
With the Act not yet signed and regulations still to be written, it is tempting for businesses to wait. The messages from Muhwati and Mutambara point in the opposite direction.
There are several low-regret moves companies can start today:
- Measure what matters. Begin mapping energy use, fuel consumption, and major emissions sources across operations and supply chains. Imperfect data is better than none.
- Engage in consultations. When the ministry calls for input on regulations or the Technology Needs Assessment, respond. Those who sit at the table now will shape the rules they later live under.
- Pilot climate projects. Even small trials – a solar pump at one irrigation scheme, efficient curing barns at a subset of tobacco barns, a switch to low-emission fertiliser on part of a maize estate – can build the experience and evidence that financiers and regulators look for.
- Build internal capacity. Identify people in finance, operations and sustainability who can engage with NDC targets, GCF criteria, and emerging climate disclosure norms. Train them.
As Zimbabwe aligns its development agenda with AU Agenda 2063 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, the climate law is one of the tools meant to stop climate risk from undercutting hard-won gains in food security and growth.
The subtext in Harare this week was that the tool is almost ready. The question is who will pick it up first.
Back in the conference room, as the presentations wound down, the mood was a mix of concern and opportunity. Exporters worried about CBAM. Manufacturers asked about timelines. A few quietly compared notes on solar retrofits and energy audits already under way.
For all the complexity, one thing came through clearly from both the policymaker and the project coordinator: this transition will not be done to business. It will be done, or not done, with business.
And that means the next chapter of Zimbabwe’s climate story will be written not only in Parliament, but in the daily decisions of those who plant, process, export and finance across the country’s fields and factories.
?? Subscribe to our WhatsApp Channel to Get Our Updates On Your Mobile
About The Author
